PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11319
------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-07 05:35 ------- The bug has been fixed by the alias.c patch. However, there were questions raised about the effect of the patch on the performance of gcc compiled code. I have left the bug report open for now as a reminder to look into this issue. I have checked in a patch to fix the loop_regs_update !INSN_P problem I mentioned earlier. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00397.html I have done SPEC testing on a Pentium4 system running GNU/Linux. I used -O2 -march=pentium4 as the gcc optimization options. I see no significant effect on the performance for those benchmarks that I could get running. I do see a noticable drop in 301.apsi performance after the first loop_regs_update patch went in, but it went back up after the alias.c patch went in, so the problem seems to have corrected itself. PowerPC performance tests are pending. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
