PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11984
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |roger at eyesopen dot com
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-19
22:02 -------
Here are the dates from Phil's regression hunter: Search converges between
2003-08-11-trunk
(#369) and 2003-08-12-trunk (#370).
Looks to be one of these patches, Roger could take a look?:
2003-08-11 Roger Sayle
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_binary_operation): Replace calls to
gen_rtx_NEG and gen_rtx_NOT with calls to simplify_gen_unary,
and calls to gen_rtx_PLUS, gen_rtx_MULT, gen_rtx_LSHIFTRT,
gen_rtx_ASHIFT and gen_rtx_AND with calls to simplify_gen_binary.
2003-08-11 Roger Sayle
* expr.c (expand_expr): If an ABS_EXPR has a complex type, abort.
* c-typeck.c (build_unary_op): COMPLEX_TYPE is not a valid
typecode for an ABS_EXPR.
* doc/c-tree.texi: Document ABS_EXPR.
2003-08-11 Roger Sayle
* fold-const.c (fold): Optimize any associative floating point
operator with -funsafe-math-optimizations, not just MULT_EXPR.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
