Your message dated Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:41:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line m68k fontconfig update?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2003 01:23:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 07 20:23:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pool-141-156-213-223.res.east.verizon.net (gleep.earth.sol)
[141.156.213.223]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Oott-00019G-00; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 20:23:14 -0500
Received: from cts by gleep.earth.sol with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19Ootq-0004KD-00; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 21:23:10 -0400
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fontconfig: [m68k] segfault during postinst
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 21:23:10 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: fontconfig
Version: 2.2.0-5
Severity: important
I just saw this in the buildlog of kdeedu:
Setting up fontconfig (2.2.0-5) ...
Regenerating fonts cache.../var/lib/dpkg/info/fontconfig.postinst: line 84:
3890 Segmentation fault HOME=/root fc-cache -f -v >/var/log/fontconfig.log
2>&1
failed; see /var/log/fontconfig.log for more information
done.
bin/sh-2.05b# cat /var/log/fontconfig.log
fc-cache: "/usr/share/fonts": bin/sh-2.05b#
The package failes to build, but that seems to be due to another problem.
But why does fontconfig segault, and why doesn't the installation of
fontconfig fail when its postinst segfaults?
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdeedu&ver=4%3A3.1.2-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1055027479&file=log&as=raw
Christian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 196563-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2003 19:42:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 15 14:42:13 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19nkSj-0004ZC-00; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:42:13 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA25384;
Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:41:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h7FJfZx16573;
Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:41:35 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:41:35 +0200
To: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: m68k fontconfig update?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_VM
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Christian T. Steigies writes:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 07:57:27PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Christian,
> >
> > does this still occur, when fontconfig (and maybe libfreetype) gets
> > compiled with gcc-3.3.1-1?
>
> The current fontconfig (2.2.1-1) is installing fine, kdeedu, the package
> that had the problem, has been built inthe meantime on m68k.
ok, closing the report.
