[Send only an BCC to python-dev, as this is a Debian issue only]

Gregor Hoffleit writes:
> * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030519 18:39]:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:16:50AM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> > > 
> > >     Luke> gcc 3.3 is now the latest for unstable.
> > > 
> > >     Luke> gcc 3.3 contains a package libstdc++-5.
> > > 
> > >     Luke> python2.2 is compiled with gcc 3.2.
> > > 
> > >     Luke> installing the latest libstdc++-5, which is compiled with gcc 
> > > 3.3,
> > >     Luke> causes python2.2 to complain:
> > > 
> > >     Luke> /usr/lib/libgcc1_s.so.1 cannot find GCC_3.3 in libstdc++-5.
> > > 
> > > Is python2.2 compiled by you from source or is it a Debian-provided 
> > > package?
> >  
> >  debian-provided.  i've actually had to remove gcc altogether in order
> >  to solve the problem (!!!)
> 
> Please report such issues to the Debian Bug Tracking System
> (http://bugs.debian.org).
> 
> I'm not able to reproduce this problem when I "apt-get install -t
> unstable python2.2 gcc-3.3 g++-3.3". On my system, python2.2 is linked
> with /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5, which is provided by the package
> libstdc++5, that has been built from the gcc-3.3 source indeed. And
> still python2.2 just works fine.
> 
> The line with /usr/lib/libgcc1_s.so.1 looks dubious. This ought to be
> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1, which is provided by the libgcc1 package, which is
> also derived from the gcc-3.3 source.
> 
> Can you please make sure that this is really the Debian python2.2
> binary, and that you're indeed using /usr/lib/libgcc1_s.so.1 ?

Thanks Gregor, I think that's the point. Luke doesn't have /lib in
/etc/ld.so.conf, and after the upgrade, /lib/libgcc1_s.so.1 is not
found. I checked back to libgcc1_3.0.1-1_i386.deb, but could not find
_any_ libgcc1, which gets installed in /usr/lib. So you might want to:

- add /lib to /etc/ld.so.conf before /usr/lib
- install the new libgcc1
- then upgrade other packages.

It seems to be a local problem with your installation, else we had
more than one bug report ... I'm downgrading the report to severity
important now, tagging it as unreproducible.

        Matthias


Reply via email to