Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2003 04:25:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#189189: libstdc++5* package description talks about v3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2003 22:29:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 15 17:29:40 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 195Yvs-0002mt-00; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:29:40 -0500
Received: (qmail 18970 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2003 22:29:39 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 15 Apr 2003 22:29:39 -0000
Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
        id 195YvN-0006YM-00; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:29:09 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libstdc++5* package description talks about v3
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:29:08 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libstdc++5
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre8
Severity: minor


The package description of the various libstdc++5* packages
(libstdc++5, libstdc++5-dev, libstdc++5-3.3-dev) talks about
v3 and g++-3.0 .



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 189189-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2003 02:25:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 16 21:25:20 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.202.12] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 195z5T-000757-00; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 21:25:19 -0500
Received: (qmail 2289 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2003 02:25:16 -0000
Received: from mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.202.58)
  by hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with QMQP; 17 Apr 2003 02:25:16 -0000
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 04:25:15 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#189189: libstdc++5* package description talks about v3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=4.0
        tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
              SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
              USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 01:09:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > Package: libstdc++5
> > Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre8
> > Severity: minor
> > 
> > 
> > The package description of the various libstdc++5* packages
> > (libstdc++5, libstdc++5-dev, libstdc++5-3.3-dev) talks about
> > v3 and g++-3.0 .
> 
> gcc-3.2 (1:3.2.2ds4-0pre4) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * Clarify libstdc++ description (so version and library version).
>     Closes: #175799.
> 
> what is wrong/unclear with the description?

I confused the v3 with the .so name...

Closing this bug.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


Reply via email to