Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have you tried running the orginal test case from > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1999-12n/msg00664.html > > with gcc 3.1 built without the g++-cxa-atexit.dpatch.
Yes, and it works fine for me with and without the patch. > Both HJ Lu and Jakub Jelinek have been trying to make > clear that since glibc 2.2 the -fuse-cxa-atexit is unnecessary > because __cxa_atexit is no provide through the glibc > atexit call. While they are factually correct, you incorrectly draw the conclusion that the g++-cxa-atexit.dpatch is not needed. > That is why you can build gcc 3.1 without the patch and it passes > the test case with or without being compiled with > -fuse-cxa-atexit. The patch is totally uncessary. It certainly is necessary. Without it, g++ won't register dtors for global objects with atexit. Regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
