On 6/04, Matthias Klose wrote: | Ada: | | - should we build gnat from the gcc-3.1 source at all?
Sure. | - package names: I choose gnat-3.15 and libgnat3.15a. Is this ok, or | should it be gnat-3.1? Mmm, at least until we are sure that this version of GNAT is as stable as the previous one, I would prefer a totally different name (the official release number will be GNAT 5.0 anyway). What about gcc-gnat-<date>? Or gcc-gnat-3.1? If everything gets OK, no problem for moving to your package. | - Do we want to have a versioned Ada package? If yes, the existing | Ada compiler has to be repackaged. | | - If we have versioned names, then we will need to provide the correct | gnatbind executable for the build process. Currently I only tested | with gnat-3.14. | | - The installation of gnat goes wrong. I had to explicitely call | the add-install.common target. | | - Sam, please could you update the relink script from gnat-3.14 | for gnat-3.15? Currently all tools are linked statically. Unfortunately, I am fully booked for next week, then I leave for a 3 weeks vacation, then two crazy weeks and again one week of vacation. As a consequence, I will be totally unable to work on GNAT and unresponsive for the next 7 weeks at least. | - More architectures: Chris wrote, he wanted to build for alpha. | Anyone else for other architectures? Cross compilation needed, not difficult, only tedious. Sam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
