Greetings! LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can you clarify whether this is a new failure, or one that has just gone > > unnoticed previously? > > The blas package has previously built (although auric is down so I can't > see _which_version...). I don't know if this code changed between then and > now, or if this is a new bug in g77. > Yes, -7 built on arm just fine, now -8 has a catastrophic failure -- no changes between the two except for a retriction of the test cases run on hppa, a modification which I was sure until a few moment ago would get blas into testing! :-(. Take care, > > I'm downgrading it to "important" on the assumption that the bug has > > existed in all older versions of the compiler as well. If it's actually > > a regression, please feel free to set it back to "serious"; in that > > case, it would help to know what the last version was that worked. > > > It would also be interesting to know whether gcc-snapshot is able to > > compile the code successfully. > > I'll work on these later tonight when I get home. > > lamont > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
