Martin v. Loewis writes: > > > I can't see a reason for libstdc++ requiring _GNU_SOURCE except for the > > > desire to re-export symbols in std::, for which I would propose a > > > different strategy. > > > > It would help to know why this was done in the first place; there could be > > other reasons. > > Sure, that could be possible. Anybody working on a patch will > certainly find out. If the test suite passes, there weren't any other > reasons. > > Please note that it is not trivial to modify c++config.h to take into > account the glibc configuration, since it is generated through > autoheader/autoconf.
[short question ... is this forum appropriate for this discussion or should we CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
