On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: > here we go ... The packages are in incoming, built for i386, hppa > patch checked, libgcc symlink corrected. > > known issues: > > - doxygen segfaults generating the libstdc++-v3 docs (1.3.6 worked > ok). results in an empty html_user dir. > > - the subreg-byte patch applies, but misses the two texi files (moved > to the doc subdir). the patch applies with exit status 0, however > correcting the dir reveals two rejects in these files. > > The source tarball is the upstream tarball.
Do we really need the doxygen part anyway? It's not compilable on Alpha unless we use gcc-3.0 anyway (and even then, it's untested...it's that bad C++ problem with 2.95.x that kept it from working from what I can tell). C
