Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2001 22:36:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 06 17:36:57 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from studsv07.studserv.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.21.37]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14leqf-0004PL-00; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 17:36:57 -0500
Received: from ysabell [129.69.166.244] by studsv07.studserv.uni-stuttgart.de
with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A507E80103D4; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 00:36:55 +0200
Received: from marcelo by ysabell with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14leqc-0000nT-00; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 00:36:54 +0200
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 00:36:54 +0200
From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please provide a better description
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Operating-System: Linux ysabell 2.4.3
Sender: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fixincludes
Version: 3.0-pre010
Severity: normal
The current description reads:
> fixincludes - Fix header files
> Fix places in in the header files which use constructs that are
> incompatible with ANSI C.
> Not all packages with header files are installed at gccs build time
I really can't make heads or tails out of that. Is this a developers'
package? Will it fix my includes? Does it fix other people's includes?
Is this gcc-3.0 specific? What does this *do*?
-- System Information
Debian Release: unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ysabell 2.4.3 #1 Sun Apr 1 19:05:08 CEST 2001 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 93157-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:10:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:10:18 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1548jm-0005Ir-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:10:14 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03363;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01795;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) unstable; urgency=high
* Urgency "high" for replacing the gcc-3.0 snapshots in testing, which
now are incompatile due to the changed ABIs.
* Upstream begins tagging with "gcc-3_0_pre_2001mmdd".
* Tighten dependencies to install only binary packages derived from
one source (#98851). Tighten libc6-dev dependency to match libc6.
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010525) unstable; urgency=low
* ATTENTION: The ABI (exception handling) changed. No upgrade path from
earlier snapshots (you had been warned in the postinst ...)
Closing #93597, #94576, #96448, #96461.
You have to rebuild
* HELP is appreciated for scanning the Debian BTS and sending followups
to bug reports!!!
* Should we name debian gcc uploads? What about a "still seeking
g++ maintainer" upload?
* Fixed in gcc-3.0: #97030
* Update patches for recent (010525) CVS sources.
* Make check depend on build target (fakeroot problmes).
* debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk: new file, build first.
* Free memory detection on the hurd for running the testsuite.
* Update debhelper build dependency.
* libstdc++-doc: Include doxygen generated docs.
* Fix boring packaging bugs, too tired for appropriate changelogs ...
#93343, #96348, #96262, #97134, #97905, #96451, #95812, #93157
* Fixed bugs: #87000.
