Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010425
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2001 09:19:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 04:19:56 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sticks.phy.bris.ac.uk [137.222.30.155] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14p5Ap-0007Fs-00; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 04:19:55 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by sticks.phy.bris.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id KAA09940
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:19:44 +0100
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:19:44 +0100
From: Major A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: octave gives wrong results on Alpha 21264
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Package: octave
Version: 2.0.16-2
Architecture: alpha

On alpha 21164 (EV56), all is fine, but on 21264A (EV67), octave gives
incorrect results:

octave:1> pi/2
ans = 1.5708
octave:2> pi/3
ans = 1
octave:3> pi/4
ans = 0.78540
octave:4> 1/3
ans = 0.25000
octave:5> 1/(1+1+1)
ans = 0.25000

Other programs do not make the same mistakes on this machine. The
mainboard and CPU have been changed recently, no change. Motherboard
is the UP1100, 768MB RAM.

OS is standard Debian potato, latest update, linux 2.2.17.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 94137-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2001 20:31:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 15:31:20 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14sVwV-0005OP-00; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:31:19 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA24598;
        Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id WAA06338;
        Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:40 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:39 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010425
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds1-0.010424) unstable; urgency=high

  * Apply updated ppc-fsirl patch (function.c removed) for all archs again.
    urgency=high for powerpc.
  * Remove patches included in ppc-fsirl patch: ppc-descriptions, ppc-ice.
  * Correct build dependency (hurd-i386) (#94038).
  * debian/rules2: Get free memory correctly on hurd (#94127).
  * close #68452: ash is available on sparc and doesn't have any
    special build rules for sparc.
  * close #79882: bind-8.2.3 compiles fine on i386.
  * Alpha related bug fixed in 2.95.3 (closes #94137).
  * Fix typo in docs (-fstdc -> -stdc). Closes #94894, #94899.
  * Not a bug: #93481 (see report).


Reply via email to