Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2025 04:34:02 +0000
with message-id <e1tmmdu-005gqo...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1088086: fixed in dh-elpa 2.1.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088086,
regarding dh-elpa: ert_selectors not taking effect
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1088086: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088086
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dh-elpa
Version: 2.1.5
Severity: normal

I have added support of `ert_selectors' to dh-elpa hoping to avoid
having to use a separate ert-helper script to make things easier, but
the implementation was incorrect as it's using an extension supported by
flycheck-run-tests-batch but not ERT.

I'm thinking about two ways forward:

1. Fix the ert_selectors usage to construct the S-exp correctly.  The
proposed fix is pushed to a separate branch and the diff can be found at
[1].  Note that this fix does not require an archive rebuild.

2. Drop support for ert_selectors.  I would like to see if people think
this optional is unnecessary and would prefer to use an ert-helper
script for complex use cases anyway.

I would prefer option 1, but would like to gather more people's opinions
about this before moving forward.

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/dh-elpa/-/compare/master...ert_selectors_fix?from_project_id=18920&straight=false

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.8
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-27-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages dh-elpa depends on:
ii  debhelper               13.11.4
ii  emacs                   1:29.4+1-3~bpo12+0manphiz1
ii  emacs-gtk [emacs]       1:29.4+1-3~bpo12+0manphiz1
ii  libarray-utils-perl     0.5-3
ii  libconfig-tiny-perl     2.28-2
ii  libdebian-source-perl   0.122
ii  libdpkg-perl            1.21.22
ii  libfile-find-rule-perl  0.34-3
ii  libtext-glob-perl       0.11-3
ii  perl                    5.36.0-7+deb12u1

dh-elpa recommends no packages.

dh-elpa suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Regards,
Xiyue Deng

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dh-elpa
Source-Version: 2.1.6
Done: Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dh-elpa, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1088...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> (supplier of updated dh-elpa package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:26:03 +0800
Source: dh-elpa
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Emacsen team <debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>
Closes: 1088086 1098846
Changes:
 dh-elpa (2.1.6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Xiyue Deng ]
   * Correctly construct ERT selectors S-exp (Closes: #1088086).
     - Was under the wrong impression that ERT selectors can be specified
       as the remaining command line arguments.
       + That turns out to be an extension in flycheck-run-tests-main.
     - Now properly make it part of the ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit s-exp.
     - Update documentation accordingly.
   * Prefer "-f" over "--eval" when running `ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit'
 .
   [ Sean Whitton ]
   * Replace call to removed package--prepare-dependencies
     (Closes: #1098846).
     Thanks to Xiyue Deng for investigating, and finding the fix.
   * Raise dependency on Emacs to require 30.1 for lm-package-requires.
Checksums-Sha1:
 f17df3485dacb0e9a269667b835ccc29ead5aed9 1914 dh-elpa_2.1.6.dsc
 0c774644ec1bab2e3e1fc2a2510ac23965f25b6e 27876 dh-elpa_2.1.6.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 3c303e3fd0051cbd8ab9325d922fed1f4de8b87f6a86414b650cf185e0d36be1 1914 
dh-elpa_2.1.6.dsc
 aac6e6273cffeda299161708647186175e6af389f9557549deee82998c6cb631 27876 
dh-elpa_2.1.6.tar.xz
Files:
 b6a3198285a1bcb16f24402a467079b3 1914 devel optional dh-elpa_2.1.6.dsc
 0faf9e76906c099519615f8fa33c6063 27876 devel optional dh-elpa_2.1.6.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=66zX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgprPMH9baURz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to