Xiyue Deng <manp...@gmail.com> writes:

> "Matteo F. Vescovi" <m...@debian.org> writes:
>
>> Hi again!
>>
>> On 2024-11-03 at 08:03 (GMT), Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I dput 4.1.2-1 because there's no practical
>>> difference between the two.
>>
>> This isn't actually true:
>>
>> $ git diff v4.1.1 v4.1.2 lisp/magit.el
>> diff --git a/lisp/magit.el b/lisp/magit.el
>> index 845c5e5f..b4502365 100644
>> --- a/lisp/magit.el
>> +++ b/lisp/magit.el
>> @@ -17,14 +17,14 @@
>>  ;; Homepage: https://github.com/magit/magit
>>  ;; Keywords: git tools vc
>>
>> -;; Package-Version: 4.1.1
>> +;; Package-Version: 4.1.2
>>  ;; Package-Requires: (
>>  ;;     (emacs "26.1")
>>  ;;     (compat "30.0.0.0")
>>  ;;     (dash "2.19.1")
>> -;;     (magit-section "4.1.1")
>> +;;     (magit-section "4.1.2")
>>  ;;     (seq "2.24")
>> -;;     (transient "0.7.6")
>> +;;     (transient "0.7.8")
>>  ;;     (with-editor "3.4.2"))
>>
>>  ;; SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
>>
>> This is the reason for the fail at install phase.
>>
>
> I think this kind of temporarily unavailable dependency package issue
> can be caught by piuparts.  Enabling Salsa CI may help catching this in
> the future more easily.
>

I should have checked before sending the previous mail: magit already
has Salsa CI enabled and piuparts already reported it[1], as well as
autopkgtest[2].

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/magit/-/jobs/6525836
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/magit/-/jobs/6525834

>> Cheers.
>>
>> -- 
>> Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
>> GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Xiyue Deng

-- 
Regards,
Xiyue Deng

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to