Hi, Сб 27 апр 2024 @ 16:34 Aymeric Agon-Rambosson <aymeric.a...@yandex.com>:
> If you are looking for replacements for org-bullets, there is also > org-modern (https://github.com/minad/org-modern), from Daniel > Mendler. > > I've been using it happily for quite some time now. > > Generally, Daniel Mendler's projects are very well implemented and > maintained. I maintain 4 or 5 of his projects in Debian and I have > very little work. > > Le mercredi 17 avril 2024 à 13:02, Léon Lamberov > <dogs...@debian.org> a écrit : > >> Hi Nicholas, >> >> Вт 16 апр 2024 @ 18:13 Nicholas D Steeves <s...@debian.org>: >> >>> Source: org-bullets >>> Version: 0.2.4-3 >>> Severity: normal >> >>> I noticed some deprecation warnings in org-bullets' >>> native-compilation log, so searched for an upstream fix. What >>> I found was that our current upstream source is a decade old: >>> >>> https://github.com/sabof/org-bullets >>> >>> and that MELPA provides their users with a package from this >>> fork, which has activity from four years ago: >>> >>> https://github.com/integral-dw/org-bullets >>> >>> It looks like integral-dw's fork might now the defacto >>> upstream, because sabof's project looks dead. Maybe a PR/MR >>> for some of those compilation warnings could be a useful way to >>> test for a living and responsive upstream? >> >> Thanks for your investigation! >> >> As I can see, org-super-star-mode (also from integral-dw) has >> more >> features than org-bullets and better support (last commit was in >> Jan >> 2023). So, I guess, we could update org-bullets to integral-dw's >> version >> and also package org-super-star-mode, and then, probably, >> deprecate >> org-bullets in favor of org-super-star-mode. What do you think >> of the >> proposal? >> >> [super-star] https://github.com/integral-dw/org-superstar-mode I've just uploaded integral-dw's clone of org-bullets. But I'm not going to close the bug, since we probably still need to migrate to some alternative. Thanks to Nicolas and Agon-Rambosson <aymeric.a...@yandex.com>: > If you are looking for replacements for org-bullets, there is also > org-modern (https://github.com/minad/org-modern), from Daniel > Mendler. > > I've been using it happily for quite some time now. > > Generally, Daniel Mendler's projects are very well implemented and > maintained. I maintain 4 or 5 of his projects in Debian and I have > very little work. > > Le mercredi 17 avril 2024 à 13:02, Léon Lamberov > <dogs...@debian.org> a écrit : > >> Hi Nicholas, >> >> Вт 16 апр 2024 @ 18:13 Nicholas D Steeves <s...@debian.org>: >> >>> Source: org-bullets >>> Version: 0.2.4-3 >>> Severity: normal >> >>> I noticed some deprecation warnings in org-bullets' >>> native-compilation log, so searched for an upstream fix. What >>> I found was that our current upstream source is a decade old: >>> >>> https://github.com/sabof/org-bullets >>> >>> and that MELPA provides their users with a package from this >>> fork, which has activity from four years ago: >>> >>> https://github.com/integral-dw/org-bullets >>> >>> It looks like integral-dw's fork might now the defacto >>> upstream, because sabof's project looks dead. Maybe a PR/MR >>> for some of those compilation warnings could be a useful way to >>> test for a living and responsive upstream? >> >> Thanks for your investigation! >> >> As I can see, org-super-star-mode (also from integral-dw) has >> more >> features than org-bullets and better support (last commit was in >> Jan >> 2023). So, I guess, we could update org-bullets to integral-dw's >> version >> and also package org-super-star-mode, and then, probably, >> deprecate >> org-bullets in favor of org-super-star-mode. What do you think >> of the >> proposal? >> >> [super-star] https://github.com/integral-dw/org-superstar-mode I've just uploaded integral-dw's clone of org-bullets. But I'm not going to close the bug, since we probably still need to migrate to some alternative. Thanks to Nicolas and Agon-Rambosson <aymeric.a...@yandex.com>: > If you are looking for replacements for org-bullets, there is also > org-modern (https://github.com/minad/org-modern), from Daniel > Mendler. > > I've been using it happily for quite some time now. > > Generally, Daniel Mendler's projects are very well implemented and > maintained. I maintain 4 or 5 of his projects in Debian and I have > very little work. > > Le mercredi 17 avril 2024 à 13:02, Léon Lamberov > <dogs...@debian.org> a écrit : > >> Hi Nicholas, >> >> Вт 16 апр 2024 @ 18:13 Nicholas D Steeves <s...@debian.org>: >> >>> Source: org-bullets >>> Version: 0.2.4-3 >>> Severity: normal >> >>> I noticed some deprecation warnings in org-bullets' >>> native-compilation log, so searched for an upstream fix. What >>> I found was that our current upstream source is a decade old: >>> >>> https://github.com/sabof/org-bullets >>> >>> and that MELPA provides their users with a package from this >>> fork, which has activity from four years ago: >>> >>> https://github.com/integral-dw/org-bullets >>> >>> It looks like integral-dw's fork might now the defacto >>> upstream, because sabof's project looks dead. Maybe a PR/MR >>> for some of those compilation warnings could be a useful way to >>> test for a living and responsive upstream? >> >> Thanks for your investigation! >> >> As I can see, org-super-star-mode (also from integral-dw) has >> more >> features than org-bullets and better support (last commit was in >> Jan >> 2023). So, I guess, we could update org-bullets to integral-dw's >> version >> and also package org-super-star-mode, and then, probably, >> deprecate >> org-bullets in favor of org-super-star-mode. What do you think >> of the >> proposal? >> >> [super-star] https://github.com/integral-dw/org-superstar-mode I've just uploaded integral-dw's clone of org-bullets. But I'm not going to close the bug, since we probably still need to migrate to some alternative. Thanks to Nicholas and Aymeric for suggestions. Regards, Lev
