Hi Sean, Пт 21 дек 2018 @ 12:15 Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>:
> On Wed 05 Dec 2018 at 01:14pm +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote: > >> So, sticking to stable MELPA version will not require splitting the >> source code into several source packages. > > Indeed. > >> Should I patch Version (change it everywhere to 2.4) or include >> Package-Version (as it is done in MELPA)? > > From the user point of view, I don't think there is any difference > between doing these two things. Package-Version and Version are > semantically equivalent except the former overrides the latter if both > are present. > > Was this the only question that you had? Yes, that's the only thing I wanted to discuss. Thanks for your input! I'd stick to MELPA process, that is I plan to add Package-Version in the very same way. I'll proceed with the update in the next few days. Regards, Lev
