Hi Sean, Пт 25 авг 2017 @ 19:49 Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>:
> On Fri, Aug 25 2017, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > >> binary:elpa-htmlize is NEW. >> binary:elpa-htmlize is NEW. >> source:emacs-htmlize is NEW. > > Are you aware that this is already in three other packages? > > iris ~ % apt-file search htmlize.el > elpa-org: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa-src/org-9.0.9/htmlize.el > emacs-goodies-el: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el/htmlize.el > xemacs21-basesupport: > /usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages/lisp/text-modes/htmlize.elc > xemacs21-basesupport-el: > /usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages/lisp/text-modes/htmlize.el.gz > > The emacs-goodies-el can be removed in favour of your package, but we > definitely don't want a copy in Org and a copy in elpa-htmlize. Yes, I know. I don't care much for emacs-goodies-el, simply because I strongly believe that it should be separated into small maintainable packages. Then, the main problem with elpa-org is that htmlize.el is developed as a separate project. FYI elpa-org contains htmlize.el at 1.43, it was released in Sep 2012. But htmlize.el upstream is at 1.51 now, released in Dec 2016. > Maybe we should make org-mode depend on your new package and replace the > file with a symlink? I think that it would be a better solution. Otherwise, there's Conflicts field available. The proper solutions would be to ask org-mode upstream not to include third-party sources and rather depend on them. Cheers! Lev
