Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> writes: > thanks for your work on this, it looks quite interesting, I just have a > small comment/question. > >> - Add a "Conflicts: emacsen-common (< 2.0.0)". > > Isn't a Breaks sufficient here?
So I think you may be right here, but unless there's some significant disadvantage to Conflicts in this case, I'm tempted to leave things as they are, since I know Conflicts should be safe. However, if there is a significant advantage, then I can take some time to go back through policy and the relevant code, to try and convince myself that Breaks would also be OK. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-emacsen-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d34ha5tn....@trouble.defaultvalue.org
