-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 10/01/2010 07:45 AM, Tommi Vainikainen wrote: > Hi, > > all four emacs21, emacs21-non-dfsg, emacs22 and emacs22-non-dfsg > packages have been now removed from both squeeze and sid. All four packages > have some amount of open bugs. > > I could help handling those bugs, but how should I proceed? AFAIK only > submitter or maintainer should close bugs, so is it bad behaviour if I > just properly close some bugs which have IMHO been fixed/handled by > removing the packages? Can I also reassign rest of the bugs to emacs23 > packages, or what should be done for those? > > It seems that amount of open bugs for all GNU emacs packages is quite > enormous, and some of those are quite old. >
Hey Tommi, Not speaking for the maintainers or anything like that, but there is some general documentation for the kind of thing you are interested in helping with. See: http://wiki.debian.org/BugTriage Regards, - -- Jordan Metzmeier -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMpeOBAAoJEKj/C3qNthmThzkP/RUUciaxrH8rjhiqZKFHO0V2 wXw5iyuXlPUenklyiCgX/0hPNzERHAvCn1u/8yo6sj3YXkOkPELoa42ydgdtUNn9 QrMYbIiH/nWjCDOLqkGxdgFFyO39y1ZVE8l5Deq3ldQjKh5gpMOyKfJTh8dpkSEs oOS+JfESrmnQJIFJ42HghmFgQMxzALbNz1Lxn8WnwkAqsVuOVySqtbK4aJX+sQ7+ NhLnNUICFgcEhlQkV8mVLbqP7d3NFQOrhGU7p7dtB2KW0d2+2kfCKwDz9+iMGzEH ZWlZTLaA1yzxeKt8+oadlOso3gDApR1siqpD8gm9OK71N55GtJWmConCO73RiGfl 3VqT+Yrxx5JNcXTibo6VmuDEiDxF7khqxunm/XUSXHsQfteOU4O+Ssy/IYuNc2g8 z7KwzCfiUBh6vz30E4GkzxCuxGhDGaItwoohKW9czZh+lNTtmvmAd+SPLbBPQAy8 QPbkth9dy0TQTCR5HZ73un3cMnSI8EK84zFTziqVQTMLTm+/+4ahRUVEnEEeyprN Iu5rY2535oMsbK00wTQ+od46a1AcgkNrz5lbcZAasrHJ9IegFnPTaBj9vJu4wtlB Og71I8DlLOVTSZVToaaSxWpDMIEEDpbdbJhJaM48yEjUai1Kg7PIjWd3sduhFQt5 IhAQFEVqWuTkLLzJlics =Lute -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-emacsen-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ca5e381.1010...@gmail.com
