Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that even if distribution of *.elc file should be licensed > under GPLv3, *.el file under non-GPLv3 can be distributed, because > locally installation and byte-compilation are not limited by GPLv3.
I disagree. It's not simply about byte-compilation. The simplest packages usually `require' (or `load') some elisp file from Emacs. That's bascally the same as linking. However Emacs and it's many libraries are not licensed under the LGPL, but under the GPL. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
