Mike O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > +++ David Kastrup [27/10/06 23:03 +0200]: >>Mike O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>What freedom of the user is protected by removing GFDLed documentation >>from Emacs? >> > > Do you understand why debian believes the documents are non-free in > the first place?
Sure, because they are not allowed to modify or remove the GNU manifesto from a 500-page-plus document. > Do you understand that debian aims to be comprised 100% of free > software, and that debian doesn't make a distinction between code > and documentation when determining what is software? You did not answer my question. What freedom of the user is protected by removing GFDLed documentation from Emacs? It is your claim that this is done to protect the user's freedom. By removing the GFDLed documentation, the user does not gain the freedom to modify the GNU manifesto. The user does not gain the freedom to use a manual without the GNU manifesto. So please, answer this question: what freedom of the user is protected by removing GFDLed documentation from Emacs? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
