Mike O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > +++ David Kastrup [26/10/06 17:25 +0200]: >>> >>Since Emacs is not really useful without its online docs, the >>incomplete version in main helps nobody. > > I find emacs extremely useful, with or without docs. I'm suprised > that you wouldn't find it to be useful, or that you would think that > there is nobody that would be helped by having emacs available.
Emacs would remain available in non-free. > I think that removing emacs from debian completely would hinder more > than it helps. This suggestion seems more like lashing out from a > "sore loser" than someon who is actually trying to be constructive. How is the proposal to move Emacs completely and intact to non-free unconstructive? Do you consider your ad-hominems and name-calling constructive? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
