Peter Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > MH-E (packaged as mh-e in Debian) has moved it's CVS repository to Emacs > itself. Therefore, I should probably skip package setup for the > emacs-snapshot flavour. Agreed?
Yes please. (I'll bounce MH-E bug reports to the list anyway.) > Would people object to me populating a site-lisp directory with so > many files directly? I'm on the fence about this. On one side, I > like the symmetry with how Emacs bundles them; on the other I don't > like the apparent added clutter in the site-lisp directory. > Any thoughts? In Debian, /usr/share/pixmaps is the correct location for image files[1], so you should put images under /usr/share/pixmaps/mh-e/ and populate /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/etc/images/mh-e with symlinks (see how gnus does it). As for 'etc/images' vs 'etc/images/mh-e', I think having the subdirectory is cleaner. It avoids theoretical issues with two packages providing the same file, etc. -- ,''`. : :' : Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `- Footnotes: [1] Yes, emacs-snapshot doesn't follow this convention yet, it's on my TODO list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
