Quoting Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > That's right. I'll see if I can change that. > > What's wrong with the way you are currently doing it?
Nothing, I think. Weren't you suggesting making changes in emacs21? > >>> I think we could avoid patching Makefile.in > > [...] > > >>> What do you think? (I haven't tested) > >> > >> Ah, yes, that looks great. I didn't realize that locallisppath is > >> only used in that one place in Makefile.in. > >> > >> I will try building with this change. > > > > Good. Thanks. > > I've built it, and it works perfectly! Very nice! Thanks for testing! I'll try to commit your changes today, along with my work on splitting misc-unseparated.dpatch. > > BTW, I have a patch for configure.in which eliminates the need for > > calling epaths-force after running configure. I'll submit it > > to emacs-devel ASAP. > > That sounds great. Does it add a --locallisppath parameter? Yes. --enable-locallisppath even. Cheers, -- J閞鬽e Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
