JÃrÃme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quoting Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> JÃrÃme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> 'baz diff' is what you want. >> >> Or with tla, "tla changes --diffs" ... > > Which is twice longer than 'baz diff'.
And completely unhelpful to anyone who's ever used any other VCS. I hardly think the command name `diff' is so bad that it has to be removed despite the fact that it's what everyone is going to expect. Indeed, I rather prefer `diff' over `changes --diffs', even if you don't consider the length difference. (I also realize that Miles did not indent to start an argument about this, and for all I know loathes the `changes --diffs' spelling as much as anyone.) >> YMMV with regard to "baz" I think. It's been quite flaky every >> time I've tried it, though the bugs/problems tend to be _different_ >> than those in tla... the goals behind it are nice, but I haven't >> been too impressed with the reality. > > I use baz very often and it is a great progress towards > userfriendliness. Baz 1.3 takes URLs as parameters now and > automatically registers archives. > > Example: baz get http://my.url/archive/category--branch Awesome! I think that's one of the most annoying things about tla. > Whether there are bugs is not that critical: its teams is reactive > and fixes very quickly. > > Tla keeps having a horrible UI and is not making progress. > And it will not change anytime soon. You gotta love free software. :-) -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
