Whatever its name, the package is ready. The only point my sponsor wants to be settled down is the name of the package, precisely.
My original idea was dpkg-dev-emacs. debian-changelog-mode seems too restrictive to me: when (if?) someone writes a debian-controlfile-mode someday, it can be included into dpkg-dev-emacs but not debian-changelog-mode (well, so it seems to me). dpkg-dev-emacsen and dpkg-dev-el have been suggested too, I guess so that Xemacs/EINE/ZWEI or other Emacs variants users are not jealous. I have no strong opinion for or against any one of these names. My sponsor and I are only waiting for some consensus to be reached before he uploads the package. Consider this to be a RFC / CFD / CFV / whatever. If noone reacts, I guess we'll consider that the consensus has been reached on dpkg-dev-emacs. Roland. -- Roland Mas When I eat a biscuit, it stays eaten! -- Arthur Dent, in So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish (Douglas Adams)
