>>>>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:06:23 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) >>>>> said:
Nathanael> The maintainer, James Lewis-Moss, appears to be too busy Nathanael> (or something) to maintain the xemacs packages properly at Nathanael> the moment. Nathanael> Co-maintainers and/or NMUs are definitely needed. Nathanael> Volunteers? ;-) I'm here and I've uploaded twice in two weeks. But I do have too little time to debug all the problems that come at me not to mention that some things (modes, packages whatever) I just don't use that often (or ever) so have real trouble debugging. Also anyone who wants to help with closing bug reports that should be closed please feel free. Also bugs on architectures other than i386 are very hard for me to debug (all remote) so help with those is much appreciated. As to NMUs please don't. It's happened several times to me in the past and in every case it's caused more problems that it's solved. Jim -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @ http://people.debian.org/~dres | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
