En réponse à Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > (if Debian decides to apply > DFSG to documentation). > > that is the crux of the problem. guess i'll stick w/ debian for most > things, but /usr/local installation for emacs -- this has worked well > for awhile now. i feel there is no point arguing the applicability of
But you loose the advantage of dependencies, don't you? Maybe stow can handle this? > DFSG to documentation (IMHO it is not applicable); if people want to Yes, this is the point of the debate. > avoid the tricky problem of harmonizing licenses and instead go for > the > simpler reject-all-that-is-not-ours immune system repsonse, that's > their > business. Isn't it also the users' business? > the root of ethical behavior does not lie in the prevailing legal > environment, nor in the actions of others. Sure. -------------- Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
