Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The problem is for packages that are perfectly usable without emacs, but > > yet for which we byte-compile elisp files. > > > > If you don't depend on emacsen-common, installation breakage can ensue. > > I've seen it happen. > > True, but the point was that *emacsen-common* is not what you're in > theory supposed to be depending on.
[80 lines of explanations deleted.] Rob, I'd like to thank you for explaining it to me at length the way you did. I'll create a gri-el package for the package's major-mode. It would be nice to work this out in a better way in the long run. Peter
