Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We seem to have the following: > > ~ $ grep-available -Fprovides -spackage emacsen > package: xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn > package: xemacs21-gnome-mule > package: xemacs21-gnome-nomule > package: xemacs21-mule > package: emacs20 > package: emacs21 > package: emacs20-dl > package: xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn > package: xemacs21-nomule > > That isn't enough flavors!?!
I miss the latest stable XEmacs version, 21.1. (xemacs21 is 21.4 which is a gamma release and the differences to 21.1 are quite noticable if you are programming elisp). >> and it's easier to fully grasp what's going on when we are on older >> Emacsen... > > How so? Personally, I think that font-lock mode at the console alone > is enough reason to justify switching to emacs21. But you're not > forced to use any of the new features in 20/21 if you don't want to. At the risk of starting the old flamewar: You are forced to deal with Mule in emacs20 and emacs21. Emacs19 is binary clean, I believe Emacs 22 will be binary clean again (using Unicode internally). But I can understand if it takes too much resources to support too many versions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
