Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What would be the advantage to two directories? I guess it would be > less confusing. I'm wondering if there would be any drawback, though. > Maybe packages accidentally putting files in 20.X/site-lisp rather > than emacs20/site-lisp, though I guess that would just be a bug in the > packages similar to the one we already have. > > Anyone else have a reason to prefer one of these solutions over the > other?
Unless someone has a compelling reason arguing against this, I'm going to just change emacsen-policy to mandate that each emacsen should make the version specific dir, i.e. /usr/share/emacs/20.7/site-lisp be a symlink to the flavor dir, i.e. /usr/share/emacs20/site-lisp This seems simplest, doesn't present any serious problems that I can see, and is certainly better than the current arrangement, but let me know if you think I'm mistaken. Thanks -- Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
