Thank you so much for pointing out this doc!
(and for your work on Debian!)
Take care,
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Greetings! I maintain cxref, which does not provide an emacs minor
> > mode, but does have an .el file with useful C editing functions bound
> > by default to C-c ? key combinations. A bug was filed, saying that
> > C-c was reserved for the user.
>
> By my reading of the docs, the bug was incorrect.
>
> The conventions are defined in the elisp manual "(elisp) Coding
> Conventions". Here's the quote
>
> * Please do not define `C-c LETTER' as a key in your major modes.
> These sequences are reserved for users; they are the *only*
> sequences reserved for users, so do not block them.
>
> Instead, define sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by a control
> character, a digit, or certain punctuation characters. These
> sequences are reserved for major modes.
>
> Changing all the Emacs major modes to follow this convention was a
> lot of work. Abandoning this convention would make that work go
> to waste, and inconvenience users.
>
> * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by `{', `}', `<', `>', `:'
> or `;' are also reserved for major modes.
>
> * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation
> character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major
> mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major
> mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes.
>
> So, as a minor mode, it seems that C-c ? is perfectly fine. (It also
> does not appear that debian policy overrides this specific stuff.)
>
> I'd point out the elisp manual and close the bug, personally.
>
> --
> Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
> I have become me without my consent.
>
>
--
Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
