>>>>> On Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:08:38 -0500, Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
Peter> I noticed a lack of consistency in this. The file I put under Peter> /etc/emacs/site-start.d/ was never marked as a conffile, so I Peter> must have taken my cue from emacs-policy (which doesn't Peter> mention it). Peter> For example, I see: Peter> /etc/emacs/site-start.d/00debian-vars.el -> not a conffile Peter> /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50octave.el -> conffile Peter> What's the answer? It depends. I'm not sure there is an "answer" here. It makes sense to have some of these files conffiles and others not. I also tend to sway towards anything in /etc should be a conffile (in case the user modifies it thinking this is true which is my first inclination) and if it isn't a conffile it should contain prominent notices "DON'T MODIFY THIS FILE" sort of thing. So. Your call I think. Jim -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
