>>"Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> What problems have we have with slink not being 2.2? I don't see
Ben> any. In fact, I protest profusely, since 2.4 will require a
Ben> great deal of work to work out the pcmcia kinks. There is
Ben> nothing wrong with 2.2. What I want is
Ben> 2.2.15 in potato, nothing more.
I would agree with you that 2.2.15 should be the default
kernel. But we can include a 2.4 kernel in potato, perhaps with a
warning in the long description that people should use it with
caution, and with a lilo backup kernel in place.
I've been running 2.3 kernels for a while now, and so have
several people. Though it may not work as a default ekrnel,
espescially for laptop users, it can be useful for a lot of people
out there. I think it would be in keeping with the social contract
that we offer people a *choice*
manoj
--
You can fool all the people all of the time if the advertising is
right and the budget is big enough. Joseph E. Levine
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
