Manoj Srivastava wrote: > What exactly are you attempting to solve here that has not > already been solved?
He's trying to solve the fact that we have package names like "libgtk1.1.11" and "slang0.99.38". > Why do CVS based packages need a special name? I am missing > something here. Do you mean we need a versioning scheme for daily > snapshots? That has already been discussed, and there was a consensus > about it, and that was to use versioning of the form YYYYMMDD as the > snapshot version. I think the CVS stuff is a bit of a red herring. He probably meant snapshot versions. Note that the version number isn't what he's talking about; he's talking about the package name. -- see shy jo
