On Jun 23, Philip Hands decided to present us with:
>
> 1:2.0.8-0pre1.1
> 1:2.0.8-0pre1.2
> 1:2.0.8-0pre1.2.1 (NMU)
> 1:2.0.8-1
>
> etc.
No, that's very bad, because it implies that the upstream source
is the same and the only difference is in the Debian packaging.
Wrong.
> I think we need a policy statement saying that packages
> uploaded with kludgey version numbers (that are clearly there
> to avoid the introduction of an epoch) will not be allowed
> into the archive.
Agredd.
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
Howling to the moonlight on a hot summer night...
http://www.webcom.com/lalo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp key in the web page
Free Software Union -- http://www.fslu.org
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
