[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Omegaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, editing /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf is the wrong way. The format of it > changed completely.
So I should probably copy texmf.cnf.dpkg.dist over the orignal and edit to my system (if needed). No problems so far at any rate. > Did the installation process of tetex-bin ask you if you want to > replace texmf.cnf and you said no? I just found out about this problem Nope. It didn't ask. What's debian's policy when an upstream update changes config files and thus breaks a package? > and wrote a fix for this, so that the new file is installed > anyway. But you have to merge in your changes by yourself (using > texconfig). I'll try an apt-get ugrade Thanks for replying. I'll grab the latest tetex packages and let you know if it doesn't work as we expect. -- -------------(( http://www.communique.net/~omegam ))----------------- Omegaman<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "When they kick out your front door, PGP Key fingerprint = | How are you gonna come? 6D 31 C3 00 77 8C D1 C2 | With your hands upon your head, 59 0A 01 E3 AF 81 94 63 | Or on the trigger of your gun?" Send email with "get key" as the| -- The Clash, "Guns of Brixton" "Subject:" to get my public key | _London_Calling_ , 1979 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]