On 13 Jun 1998, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > >Sounds like it should go in extra, for now. > > OTOH our news server didn't survive longer then a day with 2.0.[0-3] and > runs rockstable with 2.0.34 ...
My machine has been running .34 for two days now, I have a proxy server at work that has been abused all day, I have another machine there that has been running all week doing stressfull things. I've never had the kernel glitch on any of these (thankfully!) Sounds like there may be some obscure problems - I know the pre-patches did not work well on master. Perhaps we should chuck .34 on murphy and master and see how it handles there? - Let me know if it is likely to be put in hamm and I'll see to this. Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
