Bdale Garbee writes:
> My personal wish-list for the bug system is pretty short. I would really
> like
> it if the process of closing a bug recorded the version of the package that
> supposedly fixed the bug.
That may not be so simple: think of package dummy_1.2-3 in hamm, and
dummy_2.3-4 in slink only because of the freeze. One bug is
discovered which affects both, and gets fixed in 1.2-4 and 2.3-5.
What will you record as fixing-version ? 1.2-4 is definitely wrong as
2.3-4 is buggy; 2.3-5 is highly suboptimal, and makes the info useless
:(
This reminds me of a recent suggestion of mine ("An idea for the BTS
(Was: Weeding out slink bug reports)", <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
archive/latest/6227) to really add support for distributions in the
BTS. Nobody seems interested in talking about that, though...
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
isp-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
