Michael Meskes writes: > mpsql (2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > . > * Initial Release. > * Based on version 2.0b1.
Hm, assuming the "b1" means it's beta stuff, I think it would be better to keep it in the Debian version. Changing the version number is confusing. Yes, I now it's a pain when it gets out of beta. I know of 4 solutions: * pushing for implementation in dpkg of things like alpha/beta stuff (IIRC there wasn't enough voices last time there was a talk about this) * heavily using epochs * add a string like "final" to the version when out of beta (I'll use this for fweb) * consider alpha/beta to be based on previous version. I use this for e2fsprogs 1.12-WIP, which I numbered 1.10-1.12-WIP-<debian_rel> Note that the 1st one is not incompatible at all with other ones ;) Regards, -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, alt-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | Check <http://www.debian.org/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
