On Mon, 4 May 1998, Martin Schulze wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 09:44:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Hi, > > While we are talking about obsolete packages, what is the > > story on these? I mean, I would not like to just remove all the > > picons packages (why are they marked obsolete)? What about ckermit? > > How many of these are actually obsolete, and how many just have been > > yanked from hamm? > > > > *** sound Opt gom-x 0.29.10-1.1 <none> > > > > The maintainer has posted something abuot this a few days ago.
I uploaded version 0.29.10-3 (including packages gom, gom-x) to unstable, frozen yesterday. Thus, gom-x should soon dissappear from the "obsolete" section. Btw: It actually has been "yanked from hamm", and is -- of course ;) -- not obsolete. The new version fixes bugs even in gom_0.29.10-1.1.deb (which was not yanked...), so I decided to upload all to frozen. MfG, --Stephan o-----------------------------------------------------------------o | Stephan Alexander Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | +---------------------------------------------+-------------------+ | Voice: (+49) (6241) 92566-2 | Use | | WWW : http://www.fh-worms.de/~suerken | Debian GNU/Linux! | +---------------------------------------------+ Visit | | Debian-related mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : www.debian.org. | o-----------------------------------------------------------------o -- Note: When using "reply" with your mail reader, please check that the mail address matches one of those given above (some mailers might not recognize the "Reply-to:"-field but instead use the "From:"-field for replies, which is not necessarily correct). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
