Package: debian-policy X-debbugs-cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Simon Josefsson [01/Jan 2:50pm +01] wrote: > Let this be a reminder why using date-based naming for unversioned git > packages really ought to use a 0.0~20123456-1 scheme. I see the > 'gnulib' package changing from 0.0.20060601+dfsg-2 to 20060701+dfsg-1 > back in 2006 and only later was the git-merge-changelog binary added. I > suppose it would have been hard to anticipate this problem in 2006, but > that's where general recommendations can help. Let's add this alongside our other versioning advice in Policy. It's not unconditionally a good idea but often it will be. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
