On 8/16/25 06:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 15/08/25 at 23:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 10:25:32 +0200, Xavier wrote:
I propose to release it to unstable, then backports. And then we
will be able to push it into debci machines (else tracker will
report errors for all version-5 files).
What do you think ?
I think this is great!
Please go ahead and thanks for your great work.
Hi,
I'm not sure why debci is mentionned here (how is ci.debian.net related
to uscan?). I think that tracker.d.o gets it upstream version data
from UDD, which uses a vendorized uscan version to get uscan. See
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/rimporters/upstream.rb?ref_type=heads
Is there a package already in the archive that uses version 5, so I can
test that updating devcripts in UDD works?
Lucas
Hi,
yes, udd's uscan reports this (node-redis):
uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version:
debian/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file;
please upgrade to a higher version
(see uscan(1) for details).
So it will be needed to update uscan to manage version-5 packages.
Best regards,
Xavier
NB: old uscan wants "version=4" while now it's "Version: 5", so
considered as file-without-version, => version 1
