Julien Plissonneau Duquène <sre4e...@free.fr> writes: > I'm considering getting my hands into that thing later this year, so > let me try to summarize the relevant parts of the previous threads > (with the intent of documenting this in a wiki page).
this is awesome > We would like debbugs to: > 0. keep all the e-mail features it currently offers i suggest also - allow people to do a one-time "stop acknowledging every single email i send", and "auto-subscribe me to any bug i submit". - more permissive syntax eg "control: +patch" - make better use of usertags - allow people to click a link and report a new bug via the web, from the page listing existing bugs > 1. process new requests and give feedback instantly > 2. hide e-mail addresses from public (unauthenticated) web browsing sure, (but doesnt actually add that much to the end user?) .... > 3. have a web UI that makes it possible to submit bugs, reply to bugs, > manipulate bugs .. whereas this would be amazing, it would give everyone the best of all worlds > 4. have some GitLab (Salsa) integration > 5. have better, restructured, simplified documentation with full > examples yes! (i saw someone disagree, but eg the current docs for usercategory is, at best, incomplete, and the docs for "merge" doesnt even say which one becomes the "master" bug. some pages dont mention usertag) > 6. track merge requests. > 6. is not clear enough. What would we like debbugs to achieve, more > precisely, here? think this is the same as 4. (it may also be that the link should be done in salsa rather than the bts)
