El 14/5/25 a las 19:27, Adrian Bunk escribió:
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 06:58:22PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 14/5/25 a las 12:50, Adrian Bunk escribió:
...
How many of the packages that break with "make --shuffle" are currently
doing parallel building?
I am asking since these might be RC bugs for trixie.
I believed (regarding build failures) that you only cared about RC-ness
when the failure happens in the buildds. Have you changed your mind?
Exotic setups like single-cpu or swap-starved are not something that
could happen on release architecture buildds, I do consider it harmful
trying to force maintainers to waste time on supporting unsuitable build
environments through RC bugs.
Ok, I see, you have not changed your mind... You keep ranting me about the work
I do at every opportunity, and you are still campaigning against single-cpu
systems without a good reason. FYI: As a general rule, I'm currently not
reporting those as RC, unless I provide a patch, in which case it would be
tasteless for the maintainer to reject it considering that it's a violation
of a must directive in policy.
I reject categorically your idea that single-cpu is exotic or unsuitable
to build packages. The only really required thing to build packages is
enough memory and enough disk.
Single-CPU systems are ubiquitous in the cloud. I was a system admin in
a small startup some time ago. Everything was in the cloud, and one of my
duties was naturally to reduce the IT bill if possible, so I used single-cpu
systems extensively, as they are almost always cheaper.
Let me quote the Social Contract:
We will support the needs of our users for operation in many
different kinds of computing environments.
So please stop your continuous harassing against my work. I'll continue
to report every bug which as a user I would not like to find in a stable
release, of course trying to follow the guidelines of release managers
regarding severities and the like, but sorry, I will also continue to
ignore your CPUist ideas about what is exotic and what is not when
I decide *what* to report or *how* I do archive rebuilds.
Please do not Cc:me anymore in this thread.
Thanks.
