Hello, On Mon 12 May 2025 at 03:04pm +02, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/05/25 at 07:49 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: >> > Regardless of what branch names packages use today or in the future, >> > they should all have a debian/gbp.conf file that defines what branches >> > and packaging practices are being used *right now*. >> >> I dont want to use git-buildpackage and I don't want a gpb.conf. Please >> accept >> this. Thanks. > > "I dont want to use git-buildpackage" sounds a bit like "I don't want to > use debhelper". There are many cases where it makes sense to standardize > on workflows and tools (and accept that it reduces the number of degrees > of freedom, and many using inferior tools). And there are some cases > where it makes sense to use specific workflows and tools (because it > gives more power to optimize stuff). > > Maybe DEP-14 should focus on being the debhelper of git-based packaging, DEP-14 and gbp are not the same, though. There's no need to conflate them. I think Holger's point is that he wants to adopt all or most of DEP-14, but not gbp. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
