El 7/5/25 a las 23:33, Simon Josefsson escribió:
You could probably say that the "must" only applies to "normal systems", but
by using both "should" and "normal" in your characterization of "consensus",
you are already deviating two steps from what Policy says. If you think Policy
does not really represent the consensus, you should probably propose an
amendment.
But does Policy say anything about the PATH variable content when
building packages?
Certainly not. Usually, using sbuild is considered the standard
to build packages, and many people would not accept a FTBFS bug
being serious if it does not happen when using sbuild. This
would probably disqualify a non-standard PATH as a reason
to report those bugs as serious.
Thanks.
