Hi! On Sun, 2025-03-16 at 18:18:58 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > […] > such as: > > # On time+3, Carol wrote: > # >On time+2, Bob wrote: > # >>On time+1, Alice wrote: > # >>>Some long reply line that supposedly gets wrapper at 7x chars or > # >>>so, continued. > # >>Some long reply line that supposedly gets wrapper at 7x chars or so, > # >>continued. > # >Some long reply line that supposedly gets wrapper at 7x chars or so, > # >continued. > # Some long reply line that supposedly gets wrapper at 7x chars or so, > # continued.
> Which I find to be very annoying and hard to read from my editor (vim). > And checking how this is shown now in mutt (before sending), with > text_flowed disabled, but reflow_text enabled, indicates to me the > mangling is worse than I thought, but perhaps it's just reflow_text being > applied to a text that is not yet sent and will not be format=flowed, > thus should not really be applied to, otherwise you might need to check > the raw text of the mail. :/ Ah, sorry, it looks like I started drafting that reply with text_flowed enabled, and that was preserved after postponing and continuing with a new mutt session with the option disabled. (Hopefully the example is seen correctly now.) Thanks, Guillem
