Am Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 05:53:37PM +0100 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler:
> 
> If you are still interested in them, then properly document this and
> add yourself to Uploaders:

Message taken.
 
> Not doing this seems like a clear abuse of the ITS process to me.

It was never our intention to abuse any process. I understand your point
and acknowledge that наб and I unintentionally exceeded the intended
scope of the ITS specification. I'm not a native speaker, but to me, the
term "abuse" implies bad intent, which was never the case. We tried to
prevent packages from becoming unmaintained, and I stand by the fact
that we have successfully done so. If the ITS process is not the right
one, we may need a new process. However, an arbitrary bug report is not
the appropriate place to discuss this.

> Otherwise if you just want to "create facts", do an O: upload and
> set Maintainer: Debian QA Group.

As I said in my other mail the initial goal was far from "creating
facts".  We were a bit overwhelmed by what we've found.  It might be
sensible to release several packages from Salvage Team to Debian QA
Group in the long run.

For the moment I see no actual harm done since packages in the Salvage
Team space are as open for anybody to do a team upload as Debian QA
maintained packages with the additional advantage that you find these on
one place on Salsa.

Am I missing something?

Kind regards
    Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

Reply via email to