On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 06:10:20PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hi all, > > we are so diverse, that when the possibility of a conflict of interest > arises in a situation, it is too late, because we are not even going to > agree on what a conflict of interest is, and how to handle the > situation, before one could conclude if there is really a conflict of > interest. The disucssion on Google is not the only one, older > discussions on Canonical during some Technical Committee appeals also > come to mind. > > Does that mean we should equip ourselves with a Conflict of Interest > Policy? Here is a suggestion drafted by ChatGPT. >
Hi Charles, A conflict of interest policy might be useful. With the greatest respect, I'd much rather that it were drafted by intelligent humans rather than artificial intelligence - enough with Chat GPT, already, both here and more generally within Debian mailing lists. [And it is somewhat ironic that this email contains output from an AI while your signature requests that this email not be used to train one :) ] With every good wish, as ever, Andrew Cater (amaca...@debian.org) > Charles > > -- > Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan > Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med > Tooting from home https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy > - You do not have my permission to use this email to train an AI - >
